Observations from the Edge
Robert T. Nanninga
Buzz Publications
May 25, 2007
I said “it's all about the oil” when the Bush Administration
was building up to regime change in Iraq and George W's war on terror,
and I said it before and after President Bush proclaimed “mission
accomplished” from a Battleship off the coast of San Diego. There
is no comfort in “I told you so.”
Recent history has proven me right. Under the cover of violence, and
a growing body count of American dead, western oil interests have taken
control of Iraqi oil fields.
This war for oil is no longer able to mask itself as an act of kindness
towards the Iraqi people. With Saddam Hussein long ago neutralized,
and sectarian violence in full swing, aggression to control a valuable
natural resource is hard to disguise with an occupying army.
Personally I'm glad the truth is out so we can stop pretending the
war in Iraq is about freedom, or homeland security. It's about oil.
It has always been about oil. And as long as American interests want
access to that oil there will be U.S. troops in Iraq. U.S. Troops in
Iraq means U.S. Soldiers and Marines will continue dying to maintain
access to Iraqi oil.
In a moment of Machiavellian clarity, news from the Iraqi green zone,
in war ravaged Baghdad, on May 21, 2007 of the U.S.-backed Iraqi cabinet
approving a oil law giving foreign companies the long-term contracts
and safe legal framework they have been waiting for, but which has rattled
labor unions and international campaigners who say oil production should
remain in the hands of Iraqis.
The Iraq's cabinet approval of the draft law covering oil revenues
is seen as cover for privatization. According to Iraqi labor leaders,
transferring ownership to the foreign companies would give a further
pretext to continue the U.S. occupation on the grounds that those companies
will need protection.
Independent analysts and labor groups have also criticized the process
of drafting the law specifying two-thirds of Iraq's known oil reserves
would be developed by multinationals. Human rights organizations have
warned the bill is so skewed in favor of foreign firms that it will
heighten political tensions in Iraq and deepen instability within the
region.
Not that any of this should be a surprise. Page 1, Chapter 1 of the
Bush assembled Iraq Study Group report defines Iraq's importance to
the U.S. and the world with "It has the world's second-largest
known oil reserves." This bipartisan report gives very specific
recommendations on what the United States should do to secure those
reserves. Following the reports proposals, Iraq's national oil industry
are being commercialized and opened to foreign firms.
Laying the ground work for the recent vote by the U.S. Endorsed Iraqi
senate, Recommendation #63, of the Baker Report calls on the U.S. to
"assist Iraqi leaders to reorganize the national oil industry as
a commercial enterprise" and to "encourage investment in Iraq's
oil sector by the international community and by international energy
companies."
It's clear the U.S. government is using every tool at its disposal
to ensure that American oil interests and those of its corporations
are met.
Pretending otherwise is just dishonest.